Book Chapter / Representation of Men and Women in K. G. George’s Films

Vasudev, Archana. ‘Materialities, Subjectivities and the Symbolic Spaces of Destruction and Hope in K. G. George’s Films’. In Deleuzian and Guattarian Approaches to Contemporary Communication Cultures in India, edited by Gopalan Ravindran, 141–54. Singapore: Springer, 2020.
Abstract (edited): The theory of male gaze was first introduced by Laura Mulvey in her 1975 essay, ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’. According to Mulvey (Screen 16: 6–18, 1975), cinema reflects the oblivion of patriarchal society and reinforces the notion that women are the subject of heterosexual male control and desire (Superson in Hypatia 26: 410–418, 2011).

The function of cinema, according to Laura Mulvey, is to serve as a voyeuristic medium that encourages the audience to take pleasure from looking upon. Many Hollywood movies, especially the films of Hitchcock and Sternberg, were widely studied on the basis of this version of psychoanalytic theory.

Subsequently, new sources for revitalizing feminist film theory emerged through performance studies, new media studies, phenomenology, and Deleuzian philosophy. These are theoretical frameworks that move beyond the semiotic preoccupation with meaning, representation and interpretation.

Taking Mulvey’s analysis as its starting point, this chapter examines the specific techniques of the veteran Malayalam filmmaker K. G. George’s representation of women in his film Adaminte Variyellu (Adam’s Rib), and men in Panchavadi Palam (Panchavadi Bridge), in order to suggest an alternative way of understanding the status of women and men in these works.
In particular, this chapter aims to mobilise Gilles Deleuze’s work on cinema and other artistic media in order to argue the case that K. G. George’s films offer his characters a status that can be enjoyed by the spectator without any preconceived notions.

The Deleuzian approach allows for a less negative outlook on desire, subjectivity, and identity; opening up readings of film as embodying many forms of desire and creating experiences of affirmation for the spectator (Smelik in Wiley Blackwell Encycl Gend Sex Stud: 1–5, 2016).

More info: <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2140-9_9>

Reposted from Kerala Scholars eGroup

~~~~

Subscribe KSM on Telegram here https://t.me/keralascholars

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s